Job TitleYour profile Bachelor's, Master's, or PhD degree in History, Classics, Area Studies, Archaeology, Political History, Cultural History, International Relations, Humanities, or a closely related field. Strong grasp of the English language to follow project guidelines, communicate with teams, and provide clear written feedback.3+ years of experience in historical research, teaching, writing, editing, academic review, museum/archival work, curriculum development, or related humanities workflows. Strong understanding of historical methods, chronology, primary vs secondary sources, historiography, causation, continuity/change, regional context, and evidence-based interpretation. Ability to evaluate historical content against detailed rubrics and identify issues such as anachronism, incorrect chronology, unsupported claims, oversimplification, biased framing, fabricated citations, or misleading causal explanations. Familiarity with one or more historical specializations such as ancient history, medieval history, modern history, world history, military history, intellectual history, social history, economic history, colonial/postcolonial history, or regional history is preferred. Experience leading or supporting remote teams of researchers, writers, reviewers, educators, annotators, or QAs is strongly preferred. Comfortable working in fast-moving remote environments using tools such as Discord, Google Sheets, Google Docs, trackers, dashboards, and project management systems. Highly detail-oriented and organized, with the ability to maintain style guides, FAQs, trackers, onboarding materials, calibration tasks, and documentation. Experience with AI training, data annotation, LLM evaluation, academic QA, fact-checking, or rubric-based review is a strong plus.
Key responsibilities:- Quality monitoring: Spot-check history items, identify quality issues, provide ongoing feedback through DMs, and escalate recurring or critical issues.
- Historical review: Evaluate AI-generated history explanations, timelines, comparisons, summaries, source-based answers, and reasoning for accuracy, context, balance, and clarity.
- Trainer and QA communication: Update trainers and QAs on Discord about new item guidelines, project changes, workflow updates, quality expectations, and history-specific review standards.
- Question handling: Respond to trainer/QA questions clearly and promptly, especially around chronology, historical context, source interpretation, disputed interpretations, bias, regional nuance, and rubric interpretation.
- Trainer/QA activation management: DM contributors who are inactive or not working, encourage activation, track follow-ups, and flag availability issues when needed.
- Documentation: Create and maintain history project documentation, including style guides, trackers, FAQs, quality notes, examples, honeypots, calibration tasks, and onboarding materials.
- Onboarding and training: Schedule and run onboarding/training calls with trainers and QAs to explain project expectations, workflows, rubrics, quality standards, and history-specific review requirements.
- Quality alignment: Ensure all trainers and QAs apply historical-review guidelines consistently and understand updates as projects evolve.
- Risk and bias review: Flag misleading, overconfident, biased, culturally insensitive, anachronistic, or poorly sourced historical claims.
- Process improvement: Identify recurring quality gaps, propose workflow improvements, and help build scalable QA processes for history AI training projects.
- Skills & technologies
- History Trainer Feedback Documentation Historiography Chronology Source Evaluation Humanities Review LLM Evaluation AI Training Historical Analysis
